We don't test more. We test better.
TasC defines what to test before the code exists. Based on ISO/IEC 25010 and ISTQB, it prioritizes where a failure interrupts the operation — because testing 100% isn't rigor, it's waste.
Speed doesn't filter errors.
Traditional automation is expensive and depends on highly specialized profiles. And often it fixes nothing: it moves the same script, with the same errors, into a process that now runs faster.
The result is a test that's hard to maintain, full of design gaps: more maintenance cost and less return.
Four pillars of the method.
Intelligent automation
SBOT runs what's critical, not everything. The methodology defines the what; the tool, the how. That's why the savings are real, not paid for with useless coverage.
Red Flags
We apply ISO/IEC 25010 to identify your software's real risks. We don't aim for 100% coverage: we aim for 0% critical failures. We don't test everything: we test what's essential.
Preventive quality
TasC designs the tests from the start of development. The failure never reaches production because we catch it before it exists.
Quality gate
Every release goes through acceptance criteria written before coding starts. The Q-Gate doesn't argue: it compares the result against the criteria and issues a verdict.
Testing 100% is a mathematical impossibility.
The standard's eight characteristics don't weigh the same for every business. TasC weighs them against real operational impact and concentrates the effort where a failure interrupts the operation.
Does it do what the business needs? It's the axis that decides whether the release ships.
Five steps. No shortcuts.
The method is the same for an e-commerce site and for a rail system. What changes is the risk threshold, not the discipline.
The risk gets defined
Before coding, the team agrees on which failure is unacceptable and why. That agreement is the acceptance criteria.
The test case is born with the story
The test is written alongside the requirement, not after. Testing as Code: versioned, reviewed and traceable like the code.
SBOT runs what's critical
Only what's prioritized gets automated. The rest is covered with directed exploration, where humans add the most value.
The Q-Gate issues a diagnosis and a verdict
It compares the result against the criteria. Pass or no pass; there's no middle-ground interpretation or last-minute negotiation.
The evidence stays
Every run leaves a traceable report: useful for the record, audits, the standard, and to justify next cycle's budget.
Knowing them gives us authority.
We're not a traditional QA agency.
We're an innovative QE agency.
Does your software hold up your business decisions?
Let's talk. No commitment, with methodology.